Key result
Higher dyadic confidence is linked to greater patient engagement in HF management behaviors.
Why the study?
Does dyadic confidence influence engagement in heart failure care behaviors among patients and their spouses?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
Does dyadic confidence influence engagement in heart failure care behaviors among patients and their spouses?
Higher average dyadic confidence and greater congruence in confidence between patients and spouses are associated with better engagement in heart failure care behaviors.
Supports dyadic confidence as correlate of HF engagement; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective trials before clinical adoption.
Background and Objectives: Increasingly, older adults and their families are expected to manage complex conditions with little support. In the case of heart failure (HF), symptom monitoring and management are critical in preventing acute exacerbations and poor clinical outcomes. The current study examined the role of dyadic confidence on engagement in HF care behaviors by patients and their spouses. Research Design and Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to examine 60 couples living with HF. Three dyadic confidence variables were created to represent average level of confidence, gap in confidence, and direction of gap within each couple. A series of multilevel models were used to examine dyadic engagement in HF maintenance, management, and consulting behaviors and the role of dyadic confidence. Results: Patients were significantly more engaged in HF maintenance behaviors than spouses; couples were more collaborative in their engagement in HF management and consulting behaviors. Average level of confidence in the dyad was significantly associated with patient engagement in all three HF behaviors. Spouse engagement was associated with more congruence in confidence and having higher levels of confidence than their partners with HF. Women were significantly more engaged in HF behaviors than men, regardless of role. Discussion and Implications: The study employed a dyadic approach to HF care and a novel approach to confidence. Findings confirm the social nature of confidence and its important role in HF. Clinicians have opportunities to optimize patient outcomes by fostering greater collaboration within couples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyons et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=120). Dyadic confidence was evaluated on Engagement in heart failure maintenance, management, and consulting behaviors. Among 60 couples, average level of dyadic confidence was significantly associated with patient engagement in heart failure maintenance, management, and consulting behaviors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: