Key result
Endovascular treatment options for type II endoleaks include transarterial, transcaval, translumbar, and transabdominal approaches, guided by specific indications and technical considerations.
Why the study?
Endoleaks are a common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair, with type II being the most common, warranting an overview of endovascular treatment options, indications, approach selection, and technical considerations.
This review provides an update on the indications, approaches, and technical considerations for the endovascular treatment of type II endoleaks after EVAR.
Informs endovascular approach selection for type II endoleaks; leaves comparative effectiveness open for prospective trials.
Endoleaks are a common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair, despite EVAR being the preferred method for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Endoleaks are continued blood flow into the aneurysmal sac, or more broadly elevated pressure outside of the endograft, and are classified into five types based on the source of blood flow or elevated pressure. Type II endoleaks are the most common and are a result of retrograde flow to the sac most commonly from the inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar artery. Endovascular treatment options for type II endoleaks include transarterial, transcaval, translumbar, and transabdominal approaches. This review discusses the indication for endovascular treatment of type II endoleaks, the selection of approach, and technical considerations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalzell et al. (2024) conducted a review in Type II endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair. Endovascular treatment (transarterial, transcaval, translumbar, and transabdominal approaches) was evaluated. Endovascular treatment options for type II endoleaks include transarterial, transcaval, translumbar, and transabdominal approaches, guided by specific indications and technical considerations.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: