Key result
Among 19 patients with COVID-19 myocarditis, fulminant cases had significantly higher D-dimer and ferritin levels than non-fulminant cases, with an overall mortality of 21.1%.
Why the study?
Due to significant hurdles in formal diagnosis using endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac MRI, exploratory analysis was needed to clinically characterize the spectrum of severity of COVID-19 myocarditis.
Cross-Sectional (n=19)
In patients with clinically defined COVID-19 myocarditis, fulminant cases are associated with significantly higher systemic inflammatory markers (D-dimer and ferritin) compared to non-fulminant cases.
May flag fulminant risk in COVID-19 myocarditis; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical use.
Background: COVID-19 myocarditis is becoming increasingly appreciated as a complication of COVID-19. There are significant hurdles to formal diagnosis with endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac MRI, whether by resource limitations, patient instability, or isolation precautions. Therefore, further exploratory analysis is needed to clinically define the characteristics and spectrum of severity of COVID-19 myocarditis. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course, echocardiographic, and laboratory testing across suspected fulminant and non-fulminant clinically defined COVID-19 myocarditis. Methods: In a cross-sectional observational study of 19 patients with clinically defined COVID-19 myocarditis, we report presenting symptoms, clinical course, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic results stratified by non-fulminant and fulminant myocarditis. Student t-test and univariate logistic regression are used to compare laboratory findings across fulminant and non-fulminant cases. Findings: Among 19 patients, there was no prior history of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure; 21.1% of patients died; and 78.9% of cases required supplemental oxygen. A significantly higher geometric mean D-dimer and ferritin were observed in patients with fulminant compared to non-fulminant suspected myocarditis. 26.3% of cases had pericardial effusions. 10 out of the 16 with available echocardiographic data had normal left ventricular systolic function. Conclusions: In this study, we provide a practical clinical depiction of patients with clinical COVID-19 myocarditis across fulminant and non-fulminant cases. Statistically significant elevations in inflammatory markers in fulminant versus non-fulminant cases generate hypotheses regarding the role of systemic inflammation. While cardiac MRI and endomyocardial biopsy may not be accessible at scale in low- and middle-income countries, the present study offers a clinical definition of COVID-19 myocarditis and accessible laboratory findings to define severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in COVID-19 myocarditis (n=19). Fulminant COVID-19 myocarditis vs. Non-fulminant COVID-19 myocarditis was evaluated on Laboratory findings (D-dimer and ferritin). Among 19 patients with COVID-19 myocarditis, fulminant cases had significantly higher D-dimer and ferritin levels than non-fulminant cases, with an overall mortality of 21.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: