Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and phenotype of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8 T cells in previously immunocompromised HIV patients with stable undetectable HIV viremia due to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: Twenty-one CMV-seropositive HIV patients with nadir CD4 T-cell counts < 50 x 10(6) cells/l, at least 4 years on HAART and 6 months of complete viral suppression (< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml) and 12 CMV-seropositive, HIV-seronegative age/sex-matched controls were studied. CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to whole CMV and two HLA-A*02 restricted CMV peptides [NLV from pp65 and VLE from Immediate Early 1 (IE1)] were measured by interferon (IFN)gamma ELISpot. Phenotypes of peptide-specific CD8 T cells were determined by tetramer staining. RESULTS: In the ELISpot assay, HIV patients had significantly more CD8 T cells producing IFN gamma in response to VLE than controls, whereas numbers of NLV-specific and CMV-specific IFN gamma spots were similar. Four HIV patients and one control had large VLE and/or NLV-specific CD8 T-cell populations despite the absence of CMV-specific CD4 T cells. The majority of peptide-specific CD8 T cells from HIV patients and controls were CD28-, CD45RO+ and CD45RA-. However, a significantly higher proportion of VLE-specific CD8 T cells expressed perforin compared to NLV-specific CD8 T cells in HIV patients. CONCLUSIONS: HIV patients had elevated numbers of IE1-specific, IFNgamma-producing perforin-positive CD8 T cells compared to controls. As IE1 is expressed early during CMV reactivation, these cells may be important for preventing CMV replication to pathogenic levels. In addition, CMV-specific CD4 T cells are not essential for maintenance of large populations of CMV-specific CD8 T cells in aviremic HIV patients on HAART.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stone et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: