Key result
Female sex linked to ~33% lower CV death and HF hospitalization vs men in elderly HFpEF.
Why the study?
Although the impact of sex on outcomes in HFpEF has been reported, whether this impact applies to elderly patients with HFpEF remains unclear.
Does female sex improve survival and reduce hospitalizations in elderly patients (>70 years) with HFpEF compared to male sex?
Cohort (n=1,619)
Does female sex improve survival and reduce hospitalizations in elderly patients (>70 years) with HFpEF compared to male sex?
Absolute Event Rate: 18.4% vs 27.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
In elderly patients with HFpEF, women exhibit significantly better survival and lower rates of HF-related hospitalization compared to men, despite having worse baseline cardiac function.
Supports sex-stratified prognostication in elderly HFpEF; leaves open mechanisms and whether interventions can modify outcomes.
Introduction: Although the impact of sex on patient outcomes for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been reported, it is still unclear whether this impact is applicable for elderly patients with HFpEF. This study was conducted as a secondary analysis from a large randomized controlled trial—The Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT)—to evaluate the impact of sex differences on the baseline characteristics and outcomes of HFpEF patients who were older than 70 years. Methods: Baseline characteristic of elderly patients were compared between men and women. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF-related hospitalization, whereas secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization. Cox regression models were used to determine the effect of sex differences on patient outcomes. Results: A total of 1,619 patients were included in the study: 898 (55.5%) women and 721 (44.5%) men. Age was similar between women and men. Women had fewer comorbidities but worse cardiac function than men. The rate of primary outcomes was lower in women than in men (18.4 vs. 27.5%; p < 0.001), including rate of CV mortality (8.9 vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001) and HF-related hospitalization (13.4 vs. 18.2%; p = 0.008). All-cause mortality was also lower in women than in men (15.6 vs. 25.4%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, Cox regression analysis showed that female sex was a protective factor for CV mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.73], HF-related hospitalization (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55–0.93), and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.47–0.75). Although spironolactone significantly reduced the rate of all-cause mortality in women even after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96; p = 0.028), no significant multivariate association was noted between sex and treatment effects (p = 0.190). Conclusion: Among elderly patients with HFpEF, women had worse cardiac function but better survival and lower HF-related hospitalization rate than men. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00094302 (TOPCAT). Registered October 15, 2004, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00094302 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=1,619). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF-related hospitalization (p=<0.001). Among elderly patients with HFpEF, female sex was associated with a lower rate of cardiovascular mortality and HF-related hospitalization compared to men (18.4% vs. 27.5%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: