Policy analysis highlights systemic funding imbalances and institutional hurdles in transitional health systems, indicating the necessity of safeguarding rural care and clarifying public roles.
Kazakstan, as in other former communist countries, is currently replacing the soviet system of health care financing for a model based on medical insurance. The main initial purpose has been to generate additional revenue for a sector suffering considerably from reductions in state funding induced by economic transition. Two key issues need to be addressed if the new system is to produce genuine reform. First, the rural areas have suffered disproportionately from the changes. There is an urgent need to adapt the existing system so that adequate funding goes to redress this imbalance. Second, although the fund has concentrated on raising revenue, it will only induce real reform if it begins to exercise its role as an independent purchaser of health care. There is a need for the future roles of both health ministry and insurance fund to be clearly defined to ensure that wide access to medical care is preserved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ensor et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: