Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions spanning acute to post-acute care, highlighting non-pharmaceutical strategies to reduce long-term disability.
troke is a common and serious condition for which there is no routinely available curative treatment.Because of the high burden of disability and the lack of a widely applicable medical treatment, much of post-stroke care relies upon rehabilitation interventions.This article will discuss the evidence behind stroke rehabilitation interventions.but before doing so we need to define some terminology.Rehabilitation has a rather non-specific definition: ''a problem solving process aiming at reducing the disability and handicap resulting from a disease''.In this article we will use a broad definition of rehabilitation, which includes any general aspect of stroke care (generally non-surgical, non-pharmaceutical interventions) that aims to reduce disability and handicap (that is, promote activity and participation).This definition avoids an artificial splitting of early (often termed ''acute'') and later (''rehabilitation'') care; rehabilitation interventions are relevant from the onset of symptoms.The main focus will be on evidence about treatments as these are the most common questions posed by clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Langhorne (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: