Key result
Direct anterior approach not linked to faster return to function vs lateral despite shorter stays.
Why the study?
Does a direct anterior approach improve functional outcomes compared to a direct lateral approach in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture?
Cohort (n=160)
No
Does a direct anterior approach improve functional outcomes compared to a direct lateral approach in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture?
The direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty improves perioperative metrics like surgical time and blood loss but does not accelerate return to function compared to the lateral approach.
No clear superiority between approaches; leaves open optimal technique for hemiarthroplasty pending prospective trials.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes for hemiarthroplasty using a direct anterior approach or a direct lateral approach for femoral neck fracture. This retrospective review used data collected from a single institution between 2006 and 2016. Eighty-five and 75 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty via a direct anterior approach and a direct lateral approach, respectively, met inclusion criteria. All patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons using the direct anterior approach or the direct lateral approach to hemiarthroplasty. Disposition, ambulation, and other perioperative surgical outcomes were compared between the cohorts. Compared with the direct lateral cohort, the direct anterior cohort had a shorter mean operative time (2.4 minutes, P<.01), a shorter mean length of hospital stay (2.7 days, P<.01), and a smaller mean decrease in hemoglobin postoperatively (0.7 g/dL, P<.01). No significant difference was observed between the cohorts for postoperative disposition, the number of feet ambulated on the second postoperative day, or the prevalence of ambulatory decline at 4- to 6-week and 4- to 6-month follow-up visits. Compared with the direct lateral approach, the direct anterior approach may benefit patients by small, but statistically significant, improvements in blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay after hemiarthroplasty. However, the direct anterior approach does not appear to decrease the likelihood of transfer to a skilled nursing facility postoperatively or accelerate return to preoperative function. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e1055-e1061.].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlson et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Femoral neck fracture (n=160). Direct anterior approach vs. Direct lateral approach was evaluated on Functional outcomes including postoperative disposition and ambulation. The direct anterior approach did not accelerate return to function compared to the lateral approach, despite a shorter mean length of hospital stay (2.7 days, P<.01) and operative time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: