Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has emerged as a cornerstone of proteomic screens aimed at discovering putative protein biomarkers of disease with potential clinical applications. Systematic validation of lead candidates in large numbers of samples from patient cohorts remains an important challenge. One particularly promising high throughout technique is multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), a targeted form of MS/MS by which precise peptide precursor–product ion combinations, or transitions, are selectively tracked as informative probes. Despite recent progress, however, many important computational and statistical issues remain unresolved. These include the selection of an optimal set of transitions so as to achieve sufficiently high specificity and sensitivity when profiling complex biological specimens, and the corresponding generation of a suitable scoring function to reliably confirm tentative molecular identities based on noisy spectra. Methods In this study, we investigate various empirical criteria that are helpful to consider when developing and interpreting MRM-style assays based on the similarity between experimental and annotated reference spectra. We also rigorously evaluate and compare the performance of conventional spectral similarity measures, based on only a few pre-selected representative transitions, with a generic scoring metric, termed T corr, wherein a selected product ion profile is used to score spectral comparisons. Conclusions Our analyses demonstrate that T corr is potentially more suitable and effective for detecting biomarkers in complex biological mixtures than more traditional spectral library searches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: