Key result
Biphasic waveforms with total durations of 4 ms required higher defibrillation voltage than 8-ms control waveforms (174 vs 127 V; P=0.001) in an isolated rabbit heart model.
Why the study?
Do specific biphasic waveform parameters (total and second phase duration) reduce voltage and energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation in an isolated rabbit heart model?
Population
Isolated rabbit heart model using the Langendorff technique (n=70 experiments)
Comparison
Biphasic waveforms with varying total durations… vs Symmetric biphasic control waveform of 8 ms and…
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Shorter biphasic waveforms increase defibrillation voltage needs; leaves open optimal durations for clinical translation.
Do specific biphasic waveform parameters (total and second phase duration) reduce voltage and energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation in an isolated rabbit heart model?
Absolute Event Rate: 174% vs 127%
p-value: p=0.001
Biphasic waveforms with total durations between 6-16 ms and second phase durations ranging from 50%-200% of the first phase optimize defibrillation efficacy in an isolated rabbit heart model.
MATULA et al. (1997) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=70). Biphasic waveforms with varying total and second phase durations vs. 8 ms (4 + 4 ms) symmetric biphasic waveform was evaluated on Defibrillation voltage requirements (p=0.001). Biphasic waveforms with total durations of 4 ms required higher defibrillation voltage than 8-ms control waveforms (174 vs 127 V; P=0.001) in an isolated rabbit heart model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: