Key result
Mean local autocovariance method for time-series delay selection combines mutual information versatility with noise robustness.
Why the study?
Existing methods to choose a delay for nonlinear time-series reconstruction have trade-offs between noise robustness and versatility across nonlinear systems.
A novel mean local autocovariance method offers a robust and versatile approach for selecting a delay in nonlinear time-series analysis.
Proposed delay selection balances noise robustness and nonlinearity capture; leaves open broad validation before routine adoption in time-series studies.
The first step in nonlinear time-series analysis can be selecting a delay for reconstruction. The most popular choices of this delay are the first zero of the autocovariance and the first minimum of the mutual information. An advantage of the first method arises from the robustness to noise of the autocovariance function, while an advantage of the second is that the first minimum of the mutual information provides a useful choice of delay for a wide range of nonlinear systems. We propose a method to choose a delay for frequently sampled flowlike data based on a mean local autocovariance function and compare its performance to methods based on the autocovariance and the mutual information. In addition, we compare the novel method to an established method based on cross-validatory mean-square errors of predictors corresponding to different choices of delay. The mean local autocovariance combines the versatility of the mutual information with some of the robustness to noise of the autocovariance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2020) studied this question. Mean local autocovariance method vs. Autocovariance, mutual information, and cross-validatory mean-square errors methods was evaluated on Performance in choosing a delay for frequently sampled flowlike data. The mean local autocovariance method for choosing a delay in nonlinear time-series analysis combines the versatility of mutual information with the robustness to noise of the autocovariance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: