Key result
Flecainide and propafenone outperform other acute oral antiarrhythmics with up to ~69% ventricular arrhythmia suppression.
Why the study?
Does acute oral drug testing effectively identify the optimal antiarrhythmic agent for patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias?
Population
40 patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias
Comparison
Single oral dose of antiarrhythmic drugs… vs Intra-patient comparison across different…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
72 hours
Authors
Loading...
May support acute oral testing to tailor antiarrhythmic selection in ventricular arrhythmias; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
Does acute oral drug testing effectively identify the optimal antiarrhythmic agent for patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias?
Acute oral drug testing is a feasible and practical approach to rapidly select the most effective antiarrhythmic drug for individual patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias.
Facchini et al. (1988) studied chronic ventricular arrhythmias (n=40). Multiple antiarrhythmic agents was evaluated on Suppression of complex ventricular arrhythmias and >90% reduction in premature ventricular beats lasting for at least 2 h. Acute oral drug testing demonstrated varying efficacy among antiarrhythmic agents, with flecainide (69.4%) and propafenone (67.5%) achieving the highest rates of arrhythmia suppression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: