Key result
Transcutaneous cardiac pacing achieves consistent ventricular capture and ~50% simultaneous atrial capture.
Why the study?
Does transcutaneous cardiac pacing achieve simultaneous atrial and ventricular stimulation in patients?
Does transcutaneous cardiac pacing achieve simultaneous atrial and ventricular stimulation in patients?
Simultaneous atrial and ventricular stimulation by transcutaneous cardiac pacing is possible but requires significantly higher pacing energies than ventricular capture alone.
Simultaneous AV capture via transcutaneous pacing is feasible at higher outputs; leaves open clinical utility and safety in prospective studies.
The effects of transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) on cardiac activation were evaluated by endocavitary recording (HRA, RVA) in eight patients, in order to test the possibility to obtain a simultaneous atrial and ventricular stimulation. The transcutaneous pacemaker used was the Pace Aid 52 (pacing rate 50-160 ppm, current output 10-150 mA, pulse width 20 sec). The two skin electrodes (surface area 50 cm2) were placed on the chest in anteroposterior position. Ventricular capture was observed in all patients (threshold = 74 +/- 14 mA), simultaneous atrial capture was obtained in only four cases (threshold = 138 +/- 25 mA). In conclusion, our data show that four-chamber simultaneous stimulation by TCP is possible, but only with pacing energies much higher than those usually required to capture the ventricle. The ability of TCP to simultaneously pace the atria and ventricles, though not relevant in the emergency cardiac stimulation for symptomatic severe bradyarrhythmias, could be useful in the treatment of reentrant supraventricular tachycardias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altamura et al. (1990) studied this question. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) was evaluated on Ventricular capture and simultaneous atrial capture. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing achieved ventricular capture in all 8 patients (threshold 74 +/- 14 mA) and simultaneous atrial capture in 4 patients (threshold 138 +/- 25 mA).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: