Key result
Transcutaneous cardiac pacing yields 0% survival in ED cardiac arrests despite achieving ECG capture.
Why the study?
The effectiveness and outcomes of transcutaneous cardiac pacing in emergency department patients with asystole or pulseless/hemodynamically ineffective bradycardia after failed drug therapy were not well characterized.
Does transcutaneous cardiac pacing improve survival or hemodynamics in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest refractory to drug therapy?
Observational (n=52)
Does transcutaneous cardiac pacing improve survival or hemodynamics in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest refractory to drug therapy?
Transcutaneous pacing in emergency department patients with refractory cardiac arrest may achieve electrical capture and transient hemodynamic improvement in a minority of patients, but did not result in survival to discharge in this series.
Does not support routine use for survival in refractory ED arrest; leaves open transient hemodynamic effects in selected patients.
Transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a rapid technique for pacing the heart using skin electrodes to pass repetitive electrical impulses through the thorax. This paper reports the results of transcutaneous pacing in a series of 52 emergency department patients. Patients were selected for pacing if they were unconscious and in asystole (30 patients) or unconscious with a pulseless or hemodynamically ineffective bradycardia (22 patients). In all cases, transcutaneous pacing was attempted after initial resuscitative drug therapy failed. Of the 26 patients with successful ECG capture, 14 were initially in asystole, 11 were initially in a pulseless bradycardia, and one had a hemodynamically ineffective bradycardia. Of the eight patients developing a pulse, four developed a measurable BP. The four patients who developed a measurable BP were young (ages 22 to 39 yr) and only one had an underlying cardiac etiology for his cardiac arrest. No patient survived to be discharged from the hospital. Twenty-five of the 52 patients also had a transvenous pacemaker inserted, with successful electrical capture in five of the patients. Only one of the transvenously paced asystolic patients subsequently developed a BP. There were no patients successfully paced transvenously who were not successfully paced transcutaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalsey et al. (1985) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrest (asystole or pulseless/hemodynamically ineffective bradycardia) (n=52). Transcutaneous cardiac pacing was evaluated on Survival to hospital discharge. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing achieved ECG capture in 50% (26/52) of emergency department patients with cardiac arrest, but 0% survived to hospital discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: