Key result
All single-point arterial stiffness measures are pressure-dependent, with flow-derived PWV being least affected.
Why the study?
Which ultrasound-based, single-point arterial stiffness estimate is least dependent on blood pressure in healthy adults?
Observational (n=20)
Randomized order of arm positions
No
Which ultrasound-based, single-point arterial stiffness estimate is least dependent on blood pressure in healthy adults?
p-value: p=<0.05
All single-point ultrasound measures of arterial stiffness are pressure-dependent, but the pulse wave velocity (blood flow method) may be the least affected by blood pressure changes.
Arterial stiffness indices warrant pressure adjustment in clinical use; leaves open which measure best predicts outcomes prospectively.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which ultrasound-based, single-point arterial stiffness estimate is least dependent on blood pressure (BP) to improve assessment of local vascular function. METHODS: Ultrasound was used to assess blood flow and diameters at the left brachial artery of 20 healthy adults [55% female, 27.9 years (5.2), 24.2 (2.8) kg/m]. BP of both arms was measured simultaneously. Experimental (left) arm BP was then systematically manipulated by adjusting its position ABOVE (+30°) and BELOW (-30°) heart level in a randomized order following measurement at heart level (0°). The control (right) arm remained at heart level. Six stiffness measurements were calculated: compliance, distensibility, beta-stiffness, and three estimates of pulse wave velocity (PWV) (Bramwell Hill, blood flow, and beta-stiffness). We considered the measurement technique with the least significant change across positions to be the least pressure-dependent. RESULTS: There was a large effect change in mean arterial pressure (np = 0.75, P < 0.001) in the experimental arm when it was ABOVE (Δ-4.4 mmHg) and BELOW (Δ10.4 mmHg) heart level. There was a main effect (P < 0.05) of arm position on all arterial stiffness measures. From least to most pressure-dependent, the arterial stiffness measurements were: PWV (blood flow method), compliance coefficient, beta-stiffness, distensibility coefficient, PWV (Bramwell-Hill method), and PWV (beta-stiffness index method). CONCLUSION: All single-point measures assessed are pressure-dependent. The PWV (blood flow method) may be the least pressure-dependent single-point measure, and may be the most suitable single-point measure to assess local vascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zieff et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=20). Arm position manipulation (ABOVE +30° and BELOW -30° heart level) vs. Arm at heart level (0°) was evaluated on Pressure-dependency of single-point arterial stiffness estimates (p=<0.05). All single-point measures of arterial stiffness were pressure-dependent, with pulse wave velocity derived from blood flow being the least pressure-dependent measure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: