Key result
Oral apodoxonano and lactodoxonano reduce liver nodules >93% vs saline or soluble doxorubicin in rats.
Why the study?
Do oral doxorubicin-loaded apotransferrin and lactoferrin nanoparticles improve efficacy and safety compared to standard doxorubicin in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma?
Do oral doxorubicin-loaded apotransferrin and lactoferrin nanoparticles improve efficacy and safety compared to standard doxorubicin in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma?
Effect estimate: reduced by >93%
Oral doxorubicin-loaded apotransferrin and lactoferrin nanoparticles demonstrated improved efficacy and reduced toxicity compared to standard doxorubicin in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Supports oral nanoparticle doxorubicin development in rat hepatocellular carcinoma; leaves open translation to human therapy.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) also known as malignant hepatoma is a most common liver cancer. Doxorubicin (Doxo) is an anti-cancer drug having activity against a wide spectrum of cancer types. Clinical Utility of doxo has been limited due to its poor bioavailability and toxicity to heart and spleen. Furthermore, cancer chemotherapeutics have limited oral absorption. Transferrin family proteins are highly abundant and plays important role in transport and storage of iron in cells and tissues. Since apotransferrin and lactoferrin receptors are highly expressed on the surface of metabolically active cancer cells, the principal objective of present study is to evaluate efficacy of doxorubicin loaded apotransferrin and lactoferrin nanoparticles (apodoxonano or lactodoxonano) in oral treatment of HCC in rats. STUDY DESIGN: HCC was induced in rats by supplementing 100 mg/L of diethylnitrosamine (DENA) in drinking water for 8 weeks. A week after the last day of DENA administration, rats were divided into four groups, each group comprising of five animals. Each group was administered with one of the drug viz., saline, doxorubicin (doxo), apodoxonano and lactodoxonano (4 mg/ kg equivalent of drug). In each case, they received 8 doses of the drug orally with six day interval. One week after the last dose, anticancer activity was evaluated by counting the liver nodules, H & E analysis of tissue sections and expression levels of angiogenic and antitumor markers. RESULTS: In rats treated with apodoxonano and lactodoxonano, the number of neoplastic nodules was significantly lower than that of rats administered with saline or with doxo. Apodoxonano and lactodoxonano did not exhibit decrease in mean body weight, which was markedly reduced by 22% in the case of doxo administered rats. In rats treated with nanoformulations, the number of liver nodules was found reduced by >93%. Both nanoformulations showed significantly high localization in liver compared to doxo. CONCLUSIONS: Apodoxonano and lactodoxonano showed improved efficacy, bioavailability and safety compared to doxo for treatment of HCC in rats when administered orally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golla et al. (2013) studied Hepatocellular carcinoma (n=20). Apodoxonano and lactodoxonano (doxorubicin-loaded apotransferrin and lactoferrin nanoparticles) vs. Saline and soluble doxorubicin was evaluated on Number of neoplastic liver nodules (reduced by >93%). Oral administration of apodoxonano and lactodoxonano reduced the number of liver nodules by >93% compared to saline or soluble doxorubicin in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: