PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 3, 2025JAMA Network Open15 citationsOpen Access

Prophylactic Aspirin Dose and Preeclampsia

View Full Paper
EKEllen KupkaSHSusanne HesselmanJGJóhanna Gunnarsdóttir

Key Result

Using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin during pregnancy was associated with a similar risk of preeclampsia compared with 75 mg (9.5% vs 8.9%; RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.93-1.24).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=13,828)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does 150 to 160 mg of aspirin reduce preeclampsia compared to 75 mg in pregnant women?

P
Population
13,828 pregnant women who used low-dose aspirin (75-160 mg) during pregnancy, evaluated for preeclampsia and bleeding complications.
E
Exposure
Aspirin 150 to 160 mg during pregnancy
C
Comparator
Aspirin 75 mg during pregnancy
O
Outcome
Preeclampsia diagnosis recorded in the maternal birth record at the time of hospital dischargehard clinical

In pregnant women taking aspirin for preeclampsia prevention, a dose of 150-160 mg was not associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia or a higher risk of bleeding compared to 75 mg.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 1.07 (95% CI 0.93–1.24)

Absolute Event Rate: 9.5% vs 8.9%

Limitations

  • Lack of randomized design (large randomized trials are still needed)

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear whether a higher dose (150-160 mg) or a lower dose (75 mg) of aspirin should be used to prevent preeclampsia. Objectives: To compare the risk of preeclampsia and bleeding complications between women using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin and those using 75 mg of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study included 13 828 women giving birth at 22 weeks' gestation or later in Sweden between January 2017 and December 2020 who used low dose aspirin (75-160 mg) during pregnancy. Data were analyzed from October to November 2023. Exposure: The use of 150 to 160 mg or 75 mg of aspirin in pregnancy. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was a preeclampsia diagnosis recorded in the maternal birth record at the time of hospital discharge. The main safety outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as bleeding more than 1000 mL after delivery. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a doubly robust inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment model controlling for background characteristics. Results: In the total cohort of 13 828 women, the mean (SD) age was 33.0 (5.5) years and 3003 women (21.7%) were nulliparous. Of the women, 4687 (33.9%) were prescribed 150 to 160 mg of aspirin, and 9141 (66.1%) were prescribed 75 mg of aspirin. A total of 10 635 women (76.9%) had at least 2 dispensed prescriptions of low-dose aspirin. Among women using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin, 443 (9.5%) developed preeclampsia compared with 812 (8.9%) of those using 75 mg of aspirin (adjusted RR aRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.24). Additionally, the risk of postpartum hemorrhage between the groups was similar, with 326 women (6.9%) using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin experiencing a postpartum hemorrhage compared with 581 (6.4%) in the 75-mg group (aRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90-1.30). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 13 828 women, no difference was found in preeclampsia incidence or bleeding complications between those using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin vs 75 mg of aspirin during pregnancy for preeclampsia prevention. These findings suggest that either dose may be a reasonable choice when using aspirin to prevent preeclampsia. However, large randomized trials investigating aspirin dose in pregnancy are still needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kupka et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Preeclampsia (n=13,828). Aspirin vs. 75 mg of aspirin was evaluated on preeclampsia diagnosis recorded in the maternal birth record at the time of hospital discharge (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.24). Using 150 to 160 mg of aspirin during pregnancy was associated with a similar risk of preeclampsia compared with 75 mg (9.5% vs 8.9%; RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.93-1.24).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa7305a12bd123317319c44https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57828
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper