Key result
PFO access during AF ablation is linked to ~20% longer RF time but equal procedural success.
Why the study?
Does accessing the left atrium via a PFO affect procedural duration and success in patients undergoing paroxysmal AF ablation?
Observational (n=203)
Does accessing the left atrium via a PFO affect procedural duration and success in patients undergoing paroxysmal AF ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 35%
p-value: p=0.001
Accessing the left atrium via a PFO during paroxysmal AF ablation increases radiofrequency time for pulmonary vein isolation but does not affect overall procedural duration or long-term clinical success.
Reassures PFO access does not compromise AF ablation outcomes; leaves open optimal transseptal strategy in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is located at the anterior and superior part of the anatomical interatrial septum, the area that is targeted during transseptal puncture. This study sought to investigate the impact of accessing the left atrium via a PFO on paroxysmal AF ablation. METHODS: From March 2004, 203 patients (55 +/- 11 years) underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF (80 +/- 71 months), with the endpoint being electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV) and AF noninducibility. The presence of a PFO was determined by both transesophageal echocardiography and catheter probing. Procedural difficulty was evaluated by radiofrequency (RF), procedural, and fluoroscopic durations. Clinical follow-up was also investigated. RESULTS: A PFO was detected in 27 patients (13%) by transesophageal echocardiography and in 22 additional patients (total 49 patients, 24%), by catheter probing (P < 0.001). A PFO was associated with longer total RF applications (57 +/- 19 vs 51 +/- 18 min, P = 0.04) and RF applications to isolate the PVs (42 +/- 16 vs 35 +/- 12 min, P = 0.001). Procedural and fluoroscopic times were unaffected. Seventy-three patients (36%) required a second procedure; there was no difference in the number of PV reconnections (1.3 vs 1.8 veins, P = NS). After a mean follow-up of 19 +/- 9 months, 194/203 patients (96%) were free of AF, with no difference in patients in whom a PFO had been used. CONCLUSION: Although isolation of PVs is longer, overall procedural duration and success is not affected when using a PFO compared with a transseptal puncture. The presence of a PFO is underestimated by transesophageal echocardiography with brachial injection when compared with catheter probing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knecht et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=203). Left atrial access via patent foramen ovale vs. Transseptal puncture was evaluated on RF applications to isolate the pulmonary veins (minutes) (p=0.001). Left atrial access via a patent foramen ovale during AF ablation required longer RF applications to isolate pulmonary veins (42 vs 35 min, P=0.001) but did not affect overall procedural success.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: