The intermetallic TiAl3 has been used as a thermally stable cap for Ti/Al ohmic contacts to n-GaN. The electrical performance of the TiAl3-capped contact is nearly the same as that of a standard Ti/Al/Ni/Au contact processed on the same substrate, but the Ti/Al/TiAl3 contact’s performance is optimized at a much lower temperature. The Ti/Al/TiAl3 contact achieved a lowest specific contact resistance (ρc) of 2.1×10−5 Ω cm2 following 1 min at 700 °C in flowing, oxygen-gettered ultrahigh purity (UHP) Ar. The Ti/Al/Ni/Au contact standard achieved a ρc of 1.8×10−5 Ω cm2 following a 15 s anneal at 900 °C in flowing, oxygen-gettered UHP Ar. The TiAl3-capped contact structure shows little sensitivity to the amount of oxygen in the annealing ambient for optimization, and we found that it could achieve a ρc of 1.1×10−5 Ω cm2 following 5 min at 600 °C in air. This performance is almost identical to that attained when the contact was annealed in oxygen-gettered UHP Ar and ordinary Ar. Anneals were extended to a total time of 20 min in the three ambient atmospheres, and the Ti/Al/TiAl3 contact showed no significant difference in its performance. The fact that this contact structure can withstand optimization anneals in air suggests that it could be annealed alongside a Ni/Au contact to p-GaN in air and still achieve a low contact resistance. The performance of the TiAl3-capped bilayer was found to be stable following thermal aging for more than 100 h at 350 °C in air, which was also comparable to an optimally annealed Ti/Al/Ni/Au contact aged at the same time. The TiAl3 material should be an oxidation cap solution for many other Ti/Al contact structures, almost regardless of the Ti:Al layer thickness ratio, since the TiAl3 will be stable on the upper Al layer. Use of this cap eliminates the need to alter a previously optimized bilayer, thus it is a means of enhancing any existing Ti/Al bilayer contact’s performance without necessitating the reoptimization of the layers to accommodate the cap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelto et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: