Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess, in patients referred to vestibular rehabilitation (VR) for persistence of disability after acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUV), whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can be a useful technique to define the efficacy of the treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary academic referral hospitals. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with residual symptoms after AUV were included. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent a 10-week VR program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of dizziness handicap inventory score, high-velocity vestibulo-ocular reflex gain, asymmetry index, and catch-up saccade parameters before and after VR. RESULTS: All patients reported a clear clinical improvement after VR, also demonstrated by better dizziness handicap inventory scores (p < 0.001). A consistent increased gain and decreased asymmetry index were also observed (p < 0.001 for both). Patients did not show any change in covert catch-up saccades, while a statistically significant reduction of the number and amplitude of the overt catch-up saccades was interestingly detected (p = 0.009 and p = 0.030, respectively). CONCLUSION: VR is a valid approach for patients with residual disability after AUV. A reduction in number and amplitude of overt catch-up saccades seems useful to evaluate the efficacy of VR and to be related to clinical improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navari et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: