This study examines the institutional and governance conditions required to implement an integrated master plan for a smart livestock complex, moving beyond a purely technical design framework.The target site was a swine complex in Nonsan, Korea, covering 65,405 m² with about 28,000 pigs in 28 aging barns, generating approximately 132 t of manure per day and more than 120 odor complaints annually.Field surveys, five rounds of stakeholder interviews with 13 farmers and 30 residents, conducted between July and November 2023, and As-Is/To-Be analysis were combined with a review of national funding programs and legal frameworks relevant to livestock complex development in Korea.Stakeholder narratives were analyzed using a thematic coding procedure, revealing distinct concern structures between farmers, who emphasized cost and technical reliability, and residents, who emphasized odor, traffic, and communication.The review of national programs identified a recent restructuring of the Smart Livestock Complex Development Project, which relaxed the minimum site-area requirement and streamlined permitting procedures, and identified the Act on Restructuring and Regeneration Support of Rural Space as a legal basis for designating livestock districts and forming resident councils.Building on this institutional analysis, the study proposes a four-party governance council-local government, farmers, residents, and technical experts-linked to a staged administrative procedure from basic-plan approval to livestock-district designation and permitting consultation.The results indicate that a technically sound master plan requires an explicit governance and funding architecture to be implementable, providing a practical reference for policy design in the reorganization of aging livestock complexes in Korea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: