Key result
Levosimendan is linked to ~100% of refractory HF patients reaching NYHA class I-II versus conventional therapy.
Why the study?
Does levosimendan improve NYHA class, LVEF, and NT-proBNP in elderly patients with refractory heart failure?
Does levosimendan improve NYHA class, LVEF, and NT-proBNP in elderly patients with refractory heart failure?
Levosimendan safely and significantly improves cardiac function and symptoms in elderly patients with refractory heart failure over a 1-week period.
Levosimendan was associated with short-term gains in elderly refractory HF; leaves open durability, safety in broader use, and need for RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Levosimendan has been extensively used to treat heart failure (HF) for nearly 10 years, but data on levosimendan used in elderly patients with refractory HF remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of levosimendan on elderly patients with intractable HF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 268 patients with HF (over 70 years, New York Heart Association [NYHA] classification III-IV, LVEF ≤40%, plasma NT-proBNP ≥1000 pg/mL) received conventional anti-HF therapies for 2 weeks. Such therapies include the limiting of salt intake, increasing myocardial contractility (without levosimendan), inducing urine, antagonizing aldosterone, antagonizing myocardial remodeling, and, if necessary, using antibiotics. Our study included 42 patients without symptoms whose improvement was re-evaluated and presented in NYHA class III-IV, LVEF ≤40%, plasma NT-proBNP ≥1000.0 pg/mL, and serum creatinine <110.0 µmol/L. These patients were divided into an experimental groups (n=21, treated with levosimendan) and a control group (n=21, continuously given regular treatment as before). After 1 week, 42 patients were assessed for changes in NYHA classification, LVEF, and NT-proBNP. RESULTS: No severe complications related to levosimendan were noted. Compared with the control group, NYHA classification (I-II: 1 versus 21, III-IV: 20 versus 0, P<0.05) and LVEF (30.62±6.19% versus 45.83±5.06%, P<0.05) were increased, and plasma NT-proBNP was reduced (458.35±193.16 pg/mL versus 2921.52±1395.97 pg/mL, P<0.05) in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed levosimendan significantly and safely improved clinical outcomes of refractory heart failure in elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing Huang (2015) studied Refractory heart failure (n=42). Levosimendan vs. Conventional anti-HF therapies was evaluated on Improvement to NYHA class I-II (p=<0.05). In elderly patients with refractory heart failure, levosimendan significantly improved symptoms, with 100% of patients reaching NYHA class I-II compared to 4.8% with conventional therapy (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: