Key result
Coronary bypass surgery following acute myocardial infarction did not improve 5-year survival compared to medical treatment.
Why the study?
Does early coronary bypass surgery improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and an early positive exercise tolerance test?
RCT (n=348)
Yes
Does early coronary bypass surgery improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and an early positive exercise tolerance test?
Early coronary bypass surgery following acute myocardial infarction in patients with a positive exercise test does not significantly improve survival at two or five years compared to medical therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early bypass after AMI with positive exercise test does not improve survival; supports medical therapy over routine surgery in this population.
SUMMARY This co‐operative study was a prospective randomised study to evaluate the role of coronary bypass surgery following acute myocardial infarction. The criterion for entry was an early positive exercise tolerance test. All patients who satisfied the clinical criteria of acute myocardial infarction but who were excluded had information on survival obtained after two years. A total of 4658 patients were assessed, with 3334 (71 %) having a modified exercise test. This test was positive in 728 patients, of whom 598 then underwent coronary angiography. Three hundred and forty‐eight patients were randomised (surgery 168, continuing medical treatment 180). At two years the survival in the medical group was 96% and in the surgical group was 93%. At five years the corresponding figures were 88% and 91%. Sub group analyses in terms of age, ejection fraction and extent of vessel disease failed to show any significant differences between those randomised to medicine or surgery. A positive exercise test early after infarction does help to delineate those more likely to require intervention, but a negative exercise test is not an indication for complacency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorimer et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (n=348). Coronary bypass surgery vs. Continuing medical treatment was evaluated on Survival at 5 years. Coronary bypass surgery following acute myocardial infarction did not improve 5-year survival compared to medical treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: