Key result
Cangrelor cuts 48-hour major events ~32% vs. clopidogrel.
Why the study?
Does cangrelor reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis compared to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin?
RCT (n=2,059)
Does cangrelor reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis compared to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin?
Odds Ratio: 0.68
Absolute Event Rate: 4.7% vs 6.7%
p-value: p=0.047
In patients undergoing PCI with bivalirudin, cangrelor significantly reduced 48-hour ischemic events compared to clopidogrel without increasing severe bleeding.
Supports cangrelor over clopidogrel in bivalirudin PCI; extends randomized evidence for potent periprocedural P2Y12 inhibition.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and bleeding outcomes of cangrelor in patients in the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin. BACKGROUND: Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor with rapid onset and offset. In the CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced 48-h ischemic events including stent thrombosis, without increasing major bleeding. Bivalirudin has demonstrated ischemic outcomes similar to those with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, with reduced bleeding but increased early stent thrombosis. METHODS: In the modified intent-to-treat population, 2,059 patients (18.8%) received bivalirudin, with 1,014 patients in the cangrelor treatment arm and 1,045 in the clopidogrel treatment arm. RESULTS: At 48 h, the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis was lower with cangrelor versus clopidogrel (48 [4.7%] vs. 70 [6.7%]; odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, p = 0.047). Death was similar in both arms (2 [0.2%] vs. 2 [0.2%]). Myocardial infarction was reduced by cangrelor (37 [3.6%] vs. 59 [5.6%]; OR: 0.63, p = 0.03), as was death/myocardial infarction (39 [3.8%] vs. 61 [5.8%]; OR: 0.65, p = 0.04). Cangrelor was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward less stent thrombosis (7 [0.7%] vs. 15 [1.4%]; OR: 0.48, p = 0.10), which was evident within 2 h after percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.057). GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries) severe bleeding was similar in both arms (2 of 1,021 [0.2%] vs. 2 of 1,055 [0.2%]) as were other bleeding definitions and transfusions. Efficacy and safety results were consistent in patients with stable angina, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (p for interaction: 0.62 and 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor may offer an attractive benefit risk profile when used in combination with bivalirudin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,059). Cangrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 h (OR 0.68, p=0.047). Cangrelor significantly reduced the 48-hour composite of death, MI, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel (4.7% vs. 6.7%; OR 0.68, p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: