New diesel-type fuels such as biodiesels and gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel have been developed in order to aid vehicle manufacturers in achieving forthcoming emission regulations, by improving engine out emissions and exhaust gas after-treatment performance. Furthermore, synthetic fuels are virtually free of sulfur and aromatic hydrocarbons and can improve the performance and durability of the catalytic fuel reformers that are designed to provide H 2 to fuel cells, internal combustion (IC) engines, and after-treatments. Combustion and exhaust-gas reforming experiments with GTL and ultralow sulfur diesel (ULSD) were run under several engine and reformer operating regimes. Using a single cylinder bench engine, the combustion of GTL fuel (and blends with conventional diesel fuel) was found to reduce NO x emissions substantially and improve engine thermal efficiency but led to an increase in smoke for the default injection timing in the experiment. However, by optimizing the injection timing in a GTL-fueled engine, the harmful emissions of NO x and smoke were both reduced simultaneously while still giving improvements in engine thermal efficiency. In general, it was found that the NO x /particulates tradeoff curve shifted to lower emissions for GTL fuel and GTL fuel blends. During exhaust-gas reforming, the use of GTL fuel was found to increase fuel conversion, while producing more hydrogen and less methane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abu-Jrai et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: