Key result
Mitral regurgitation and concomitant surgery predict higher mortality in simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Why the study?
What are the risk factors for mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement?
Observational (n=78)
What are the risk factors for mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement?
In patients undergoing simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement, concomitant heart surgery, prior valve replacement, and endocarditic etiology are key risk factors for adverse outcomes.
Risk factors in simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement were studied in 78 patients. Risk factors for early mortality, according to a stepwise logistic regression model, were male sex, concomitant heart surgery and prior valve replacement. For low-output syndrome, the major morbid event, the risk factors were endocarditic etiology, concomitant heart surgery and prior valve replacement. Survival curves were used to estimate univariate risk factors for total mortality. With a multivariate procedure, using the Cox regression model, two covariates were pin-pointed as independent prognostic factors in total mortality, viz. mitral regurgitation and concomitant heart surgery. The Cox model also showed the two covariates ischemic heart disease and endocarditic etiology to be risk factors in late mortality. Predicted 3-year survival was estimated with different combinations of these risk factors. The results were compared with earlier reports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelnoor et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve disease (n=78). Clinical and surgical risk factors was evaluated on Early mortality, low-output syndrome, total mortality, and late mortality. In patients undergoing simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement, independent risk factors for total mortality were mitral regurgitation and concomitant heart surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: