Key result
Rising primary PCI use is linked to a ~27% mortality decline in non-cardiac arrest patients.
Observational (n=22,000)
Yes
Increased use of primary PCI in Belgian STEMI networks is associated with lower mortality in non-cardiac arrest patients, though interhospital transfer delays remain a challenge.
High pPCI penetration via STEMI networks is feasible; Level 5 data leave outcome effects open for prospective confirmation.
The present report describes the quality of care, including in hospital mortality for more than 22.000 STEMI patients admitted in 60 Belgian hospitals for the period 2008-2016. We found a strong increase in the use of primary PCI over time, particularly for patients that were admitted first in a non-PCI capable hospital, reaching a penetration rate of >95%. The transition of thrombolysis to transfer for pPCI in the setting of a STEMI network was, however, associated with an increase of the proportion of patients with prolonged (>120 min) diagnosis-to-balloon time (from 16 to 22%), suggesting still suboptimal interhospital transfer. The in-hospital mortality of the total study population was 6.5%. For non-cardiac arrest patients in-hospital mortality decreased from 5.1% to 3.7%, while it increased for cardiac arrest patients from 29 to 37%. The observation that quality indicators (QI's), such as modalities and timing of reperfusion therapy, were associated with lower levels of mortality, underscores the potential of QIs for STEMI to improve care and reduce unwarranted variation and premature death from STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claeys et al. (2017) conducted an observational in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=22,000). Quality indicators (modalities and timing of reperfusion therapy) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Primary PCI use increased to >95% over time, with overall in-hospital mortality of 6.5%, decreasing from 5.1% to 3.7% in non-cardiac arrest patients but increasing in cardiac arrest patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: