Key result
PV reconnection segments harbor ~49% more intramyocardial fat during AF redo ablation.
Why the study?
PV-LA electrical reconnections frequently cause AF recurrences after PVI, and intramyocardial fat might play a role in these reconnections.
Is left atrial intramyocardial fat associated with pulmonary vein reconnection sites in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation redo ablation?
Observational (n=45)
No
Is left atrial intramyocardial fat associated with pulmonary vein reconnection sites in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation redo ablation?
Left atrial intramyocardial fat colocalizes with two-thirds of pulmonary vein reconnection points and is present in higher volumes at reconnection segments, suggesting a role in electrical reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May identify reconnection-prone segments in AF redo ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Electrical reconnections between pulmonary veins (PVs) and the left atrium (LA) are frequently responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)(1,2). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-derived images can be post-processed to detect intramyocardial fat (inFAT) by signal density thresholding(3). InFAT might have a role for PV-LA reconnections. Aim To analyze the relationship between inFAT analyzed at pre-procedural MDCT-derived inFAT maps from first AF ablation and PV-LA reconnections in patients with AF recurrence undergoing redo ablation. Methods and Results We included 45 consecutive patients who underwent AF redo ablation at our institution and had at least one PV-LA reconnection. First AF ablation preprocedural MDCT-derived data were post-processed to create 3D LA inFAT maps, that were loaded into navigation system for reconnection site analysis. 103 out of 156 (66.0%) PV-LA reconnection points colocalized with inFAT. Reconnection segments (PVI segments containing ≥1 PV-LA reconnection point) had higher volumes of total inFAT than non-reconnection segments (8.05±6.56 vs. 5.40±5.18 µL, p<0.001), as well as threshold subranges dense inFAT (0.06±0.06 vs. 0.03±0.04 µL, p<0.001) and fat-myocardial admixture (7.98±6.52 vs. 5.37±5.16 µL, p<0.001). Conclusion InFAT colocalize with two thirds of PV-LA reconnection points in patients undergoing AF redo ablation. Reconnection segments harbor higher inFAT volumes compared to non-reconnection segments. This proof-of-concept study suggests that inFAT may play a role in PV-LA electrical reconnections after PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landra et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation recurrence (n=45). Intramyocardial fat (inFAT) vs. Non-reconnection segments was evaluated on Total inFAT volume (p=<0.001). In patients undergoing AF redo ablation, pulmonary vein reconnection segments harbored higher volumes of total intramyocardial fat compared to non-reconnection segments.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: