Why the study?
Many patients with VTE require extended therapy, but VKAs carry monitoring burdens and bleeding risks, and safer, more convenient treatment options need to be evaluated in clinical context.
Do NOACs such as rivaroxaban reduce recurrent VTE compared to ASA or VKAs in patients requiring extended anticoagulation?
Do NOACs such as rivaroxaban reduce recurrent VTE compared to ASA or VKAs in patients requiring extended anticoagulation?
Effect estimate: 70% risk reduction
NOACs like rivaroxaban offer a safe and effective alternative to ASA or VKAs for extended VTE treatment, significantly reducing recurrence without a major increase in bleeding.
Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence if anticoagulant therapy is stopped. Whereas 3 months of anticoagulation treatment is sufficient for patients with VTE provoked by major surgery or trauma, in many cases a longer course is needed. Extended therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure that the international normalized ratio (INR) remains within the therapeutic range; furthermore, there is a risk of major bleeding even if a therapeutic INR is maintained. Therefore, more convenient and safer anticoagulants are needed.The non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban-simplify extended therapy because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of NOACs for extended VTE treatment, but bleeding remains a concern. Patients and physicians may, therefore, be reluctant to continue anticoagulation beyond 3 to 6 months except in patients at high risk of recurrence. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is often prescribed instead of an anticoagulant because of its perceived lower risk of bleeding; however, the recent EINSTEIN CHOICE trial demonstrated that once-daily rivaroxaban at a dose of either 20 or 10 mg reduced the risk of recurrent VTE by 70% compared with ASA without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. In this review, we discuss the EINSTEIN CHOICE trial in the context of previous trials for extended VTE treatment and examine some of the lessons that can be applied to clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weitz et al. (2019) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban vs. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was evaluated on Recurrent VTE (70% risk reduction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: