Key result
Aortic dissection involving the root and bilateral coronaries presents as ACS without ECG ischemia.
Case Report (n=1)
Aortic dissection can mimic acute coronary syndrome clinically and biochemically, highlighting the need for careful evaluation when ECG lacks ischemic changes.
Consider aortic dissection in ACS without ECG ischemia; this Level 5 case leaves open prospective validation.
Aortic dissection is a critical condition requiring immediate assessment and management. Clinical presentation is commonly associated with severe chest pain and high blood pressure. However, misdiagnosis is frequent because of various features. We presented a case of 51-year-old woman who complained of dyspnea for 3 d after she experienced back pain for one week. She was presented with severe respiration distress with impending respiration failure on arrival to our hospital. Her chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly with acute pulmonary edema. The laboratory data revealed elevated cardiac enzyme and electrocardiography demonstrated sinus tachycardia. She was hospitalized under the initial diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and experienced one episode of chest discomfort. After electrocardiography, she was found with bigeminy ventricular premature beats without ST-T change. Follow-up cardiac enzyme demonstrated progressive declined. Cardiac catheterization was performed on the third day of admission, and coronary angiography revealed large intimal flap on aortic root with bilateral coronary artery involvement. Surgical management was arranged after immediate chest computed tomography study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung Yi Chen (2015) conducted a case report in Aortic dissection (n=1). Aortic dissection was evaluated. A 51-year-old woman presenting with acute coronary syndrome symptoms without electrocardiographic ischemia was diagnosed with aortic dissection involving the aortic root and bilateral coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: