Key result
Cardiologist survey shows heterogeneous CIED vascular access practices with only 22% routinely using ultrasound.
Why the study?
Vascular access is a common step shared by CIED implants and electrophysiological procedures, but Italian common practice regarding EP-lab vascular access had not been outlined.
Cross-Sectional (n=103)
Yes
A survey of Italian cardiologists reveals heterogeneity in vascular access approaches for CIED and EP procedures, alongside a strong desire to improve ultrasound-guided puncture skills.
Heterogeneous vascular access practices persist in Italian EP labs; leaves open standardization needs pending prospective outcome data.
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implants and electrophysiological procedures share a common step: vascular access. On behalf of the AIAC Ricerca Investigators' Network, we conducted a survey to outline Italian common practice regarding vascular access in EP-lab. All Italian physicians with experience in CIED implantation and electrophysiology were invited to answer an online questionnaire (from May 2020 to November 2020) featuring 20 questions. In total, 103 cardiologists (from 92 Italian hospitals) answered the survey. Vascular access during CIED implants was considered the most complex step following lead placement by 54 (52.4%) respondents and the most complex for 35 (33.9%). In total, 54 (52.4%) and 49 (47.6%) respondents considered the cephalic and subclavian vein the first option, respectively (intrathoracic and extrathoracic subclavian/axillary vein by 22 and 27, respectively). In total, 45 (43.7%) respondents performed close arterial femoral accesses manually; only 12 (11.7%) respondents made extensive use of vascular closure devices. A total of 46 out of 103 respondents had experience in ultrasound-guided vascular accesses, but only 10 (22%) used it for more than 50% of the accesses. In total, 81 (78.6%) respondents wanted to increase their ultrasound-guided vascular access skills. Reducing complications is a goal to reach in cardiac stimulation and electrophysiological procedures. Our survey shows the heterogeneity of the vascular approaches used in Italian centres. Some vascular accesses were proved to be superior to others in terms of complications, with ultrasound-guided puncture as an emerging technique. More effort to produce the standardization of vascular accesses could be made by scientific societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziacchi et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Vascular access practices in cardiac stimulation and electrophysiology (n=103). Vascular access practices was evaluated on Survey responses regarding vascular access practices. A survey of 103 Italian cardiologists revealed significant heterogeneity in vascular access practices for CIED implants, with 52.4% preferring the cephalic vein and only 22% routinely using ultrasound.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: