The objective of this study was to detennine the feasibility of using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to measure the composition (NDF and CP) of diversely treated forages and byproducts.Samples (325) were selected randomly from 2808 possible sample and treatment combinations generated using 18 feedstuffs, 26 treatments (acids, bases, oxidizing and reducing agents, and heat), and six levels of reagent for each treatment.The NDF and CP were detennined and calculated on an OM basis.Stepwise regressions using all 325 samples and 10 nm between wavelengths gave R2 and standard error of calibration of .87 and 4.1 for NDF and .93 and 1.5 for CPo Division of the 325 samples into calibration, validation, and test sets consisting of 4 of 9, 2 of 9, and 3 of 9 total samples, respectively, resulted for NDF in average R2 and SE of .87,4.1; .87,4.3; and .82,4.9 for the calibration, validation, and test sets, respectively, and for CP .92,1.6; .94,1.3; and .86,2.1.The results for the all calibration set for NDF were similar to those for materials treated with sodium chlorite (less so for CP), indicating the potential for near infrared as a screening tool for treated feedstuffs.However, the poorer results for the test sets indicate that problems Received June 25,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James B. Reeves (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: