Key result
Track versus field athletes show no resting ECG morphological differences except for RR-interval duration.
Why the study?
The study sought to determine the resting ECG of male college track and field athletes to identify electrocardiographic changes attributable to cardiac adaptations and possible differences in ECG morphologies by athletic event.
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
No
There are no distinctive morphological differences in the resting ECG of Nigerian collegiate track and field athletes, aside from differences in RR-interval.
Small Level 5 ECG survey in Nigerian athletes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet inform screening or adaptations by event.
This study sought to determine the resting Electrocardiogram of male college Track and Field athletes, with a view to identifying electrocardiographic changes attributable to cardiac adaptations and possible differences in ECG morphologies by the athletic event. A descriptive survey design was used in the study. The population was male track and field athletes of Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Eighteen athletes; track (n=10) and field (n=8), were purposively selected from the OAU Athletics team that participated in the 14th West-African Universities’ Games, held at the University of Port-Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria in 2018. Resting ECG was recorded with a 12-lead Electrocardiograph (SCHILLER-Cardiovit AT-2 plus), blood pressure was recorded with a digital blood pressure monitor (OMRON-M6 Comfort), weight, height, and BMI were recorded with an electronic BMI scale (SECA-220). Descriptive statistic of mean and standard deviation was computed and a paired-sample t-test was used to compare the resting ECG of athletes in the two divisions. Track and field athletes had mean RR-interval, P-wave, PR-interval, QRS-interval, QT-interval, and QTc of 993.22 ± 111.51ms, 97.12 ± 10.87ms, 157.00 ± 34.34ms, 120.67 ± 58.22ms, 376.94 ± 55.34ms and 416.78 ± 46.98mm respectively. With regards to voltage, athletes had mean voltages of 0.11 ± 0.09mm, -0.98 ± 0.77mm, and 1.54 ± 0.73mm for P-wave in lead II, S in VI, and R in V5 respectively. When athletes’ ECGs in the two divisions were compared, a significant difference was only found in the RR-interval (t = -3.08; P < 0.05). The study concluded that there were no distinctive morphological differences in the resting ECG of Nigerian collegiate track and field athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akinbiola et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy athletes (n=18). Track athletic events vs. Field athletic events was evaluated on RR-interval (p=< 0.05). There were no distinctive morphological differences in the resting ECG of Nigerian collegiate track and field athletes, with the exception of a significant difference in the RR-interval (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: