Key result
Continuing diltiazem beyond one year post-op fails to improve 5-year radial artery graft patency or outcomes.
Why the study?
Does the continuation of chronic calcium channel blocker therapy beyond the first postoperative year improve clinical outcomes or radial artery graft patency in patients with radial artery grafts?
Population
120 patients who received radial artery grafts for myocardial revascularization and at 1 year post-operation…
Comparison
Continuation of chronic calcium channel blocker… vs Suspension of chronic calcium channel blocker…
Design
RCT, Randomly assigned
Follow-up
5 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports safe diltiazem discontinuation after year 1 post-CABG; confirms no long-term radial graft patency or outcome benefit from continuation.
RCT (n=120)
No
Does the continuation of chronic calcium channel blocker therapy beyond the first postoperative year improve clinical outcomes or radial artery graft patency in patients with radial artery grafts?
Continuing calcium channel blocker therapy beyond one year after radial artery grafting does not improve graft patency or clinical outcomes.
Gaudino et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Radial artery grafts for myocardial revascularization (n=120). Chronic calcium channel blocker therapy (diltiazem) vs. Suspension of therapy was evaluated on Clinical and scintigraphic results and radial artery angiographic status. Continuation of chronic calcium channel blocker therapy with diltiazem beyond the first postoperative year did not affect radial artery graft patency or clinical outcomes at 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: