Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/T(ON)DZP level was used to model one-to-one reactant−modifier interactions relevant to the enantioselective hydrogenation of 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione and methyl pyruvate over platinum catalysts. Two protonated modifiers, cinchonidine and 9-methoxycinchonidine, in the Open(3) and Open(5) conformations, were considered. So-called bifurcated and cyclic hydrogen-bonded complexes were investigated. The effects of a flat Pt(111) surface on the complexes were taken into account using molecular mechanics with the COMPASS force field. Only the bifurcated reactant−modifier(Open3) complexes were suggested to contribute to the enantioselectivity of the hydrogenation reaction due to their thermodynamic stability. The stabilization of the π and π * orbitals of the reactants' keto carbonyl moieties, that is, the kinetic factor, indicated that the substitution of cinchonidine's hydroxyl group with a methoxy group does not have any notable effect on the enantiomeric excess of ( R )-methyl lactate but decreases the enantiomeric excess of ( R )-1-hydroxy-1-phenylpropanone. These results are well in accord with the experimentally observed enantiomeric excesses, thus supporting the validity of the studied reactant−modifier interaction model. The DFT calculations at the RI-BP86/SV(P) level indicated that protonated cinchonidine and 10,11-dihydrocinchonidine are more stable on Pt when adopting the so-called QA-Open(4) conformation rather than the Open(3) conformation that dominates in solution. The QA-Open(4) conformation of a modifier is adsorbed on the surface via both its quinoline and quinuclidine moieties, and a reactant may interact simultaneously with the protonated quinuclidine nitrogen and the functional group at the C(9) position of the modifier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taskinen et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: