Key result
Higher trait self-control is linked to fewer visceral states, mediated by sleep and eating behavior.
Why the study?
Is higher trait self-control associated with less intense visceral states?
Cross-Sectional
Is higher trait self-control associated with less intense visceral states?
Higher trait self-control is associated with less intense visceral states, potentially mediated by healthful behaviors such as better sleeping and eating.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher self-control was associated with milder visceral states via behaviors; cross-sectional data leave open causality and clinical relevance.
Trait self-control correlates with desirable outcomes including physical and psychological well-being and is thought to facilitate the formation of effective habits. Visceral states, including internal drives that motivate specific behaviors, have been found to undermine self-control. The current study tested the hypothesis that individuals higher in trait self-control experience less intense and a lower likelihood of visceral states and explored possible mediators. We found that trait self-control negatively correlates with responses to one-shot measures of hunger, fatigue, experiencing stress, and experiencing the common cold. Reports of recent sleeping and eating behavior mediated some of these relationships, consistent with the idea that healthful behaviors help individuals higher in trait self-control minimize visceral states. This research supports emerging perspectives on trait self-control’s contributions to positive outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldwin et al. (2018) reported a cross-sectional. Higher trait self-control was evaluated on Intensity and likelihood of visceral states (hunger, fatigue, stress, common cold). Higher trait self-control negatively correlated with responses to measures of hunger, fatigue, stress, and the common cold, partially mediated by recent sleeping and eating behavior.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: