Key result
CT femoral artery depth predicts stent-graft need while sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio predicts major vascular complications.
Why the study?
Vascular complications remain an important issue after transfemoral TAVI and are difficult to predict.
Does standardized CT measurement of femoral artery depth and sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio predict vascular complications after transfemoral TAVI?
Observational (n=679)
Does standardized CT measurement of femoral artery depth and sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio predict vascular complications after transfemoral TAVI?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.61 for FAD predicting stent-graft; AUC 0.70 for SFAR predicting major VCs (95% CI 0.51-0.70 (FAD); 0.58-0.81 (SFAR))
p-value: p=0.04 (FAD); 0.001 (SFAR)
CT measurements of femoral artery depth and sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio provide complementary information to predict major vascular complications and the need for a stent-graft after transfemoral TAVI.
May inform pre-TAVI vascular risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Vascular complications (VCs) are difficult to predict and remain an important issue after transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) although their incidence has decreased with size reduction of introducers. We aimed to evaluate a standardized measurement of femoral artery depth (FAD) using computed tomography (CT) to predict VCs after TAVI. We performed a retrospective study of 679 TF TAVI patients. We evaluated a standardized CT method to measure FAD immediately above the bifurcation. Sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio (SFAR), calcification, and tortuosity were also evaluated. VCs were defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict major VCs and the need for a stent-graft. The median values of FAD and SFAR were 49.0 (36.2 to 66.7) mm and 0.95 (0.81 to 1.18), respectively. Major VCs occurred in 37 (5.4%) patients and a stent-graft was required in 49 (7.1%) patients. FAD predicted the need for a stent-graft [0.61 (0.51 to 0.70), p = 0.04] but not major VCs [0.52 (0.40 to 0.63), p = 0.76]. In contrast, SFAR did not predict the need for a stent-graft [0.53 (0.43 to 0.62), p = 0.61] but predicted major VCs [0.70 (0.58 to 0.81), p = 0.001]. Calcification and tortuosity predicted neither major VCs nor the need for a stent-graft. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that CT measurements of FAD and SFAR provide additional information to predict major VCs and the need for a femoral stent-graft after TF TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durand et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=679). Standardized measurement of femoral artery depth (FAD) and sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio (SFAR) by CT was evaluated on Major vascular complications and the need for a stent-graft (AUC 0.61 for FAD predicting stent-graft; AUC 0.70 for SFAR predicting major VCs, 95% CI 0.51-0.70 (FAD); 0.58-0.81 (SFAR), p=0.04 (FAD); 0.001 (SFAR)). CT measurement of femoral artery depth predicted the need for a stent-graft (AUC 0.61, p=0.04), while sheath-to-femoral-artery ratio predicted major vascular complications (AUC 0.70, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: