Key result
Blood flow restriction reduces pain and improves wrist functionality versus regular training after distal radius fracture.
Why the study?
Blood flow restriction improves function in low-load training, but its effectiveness and safety in postoperative rehabilitation for distal radius fracture required evaluation.
Does blood flow restriction therapy improve pain, strength, and functionality in patients with distal radius fracture who underwent surgery?
RCT (n=35)
randomly assigned
Does blood flow restriction therapy improve pain, strength, and functionality in patients with distal radius fracture who underwent surgery?
Effect estimate: effect size -2.44
p-value: p=< 0.01
Blood flow restriction therapy during postoperative rehabilitation for distal radius fractures effectively relieves pain and swelling while improving muscle strength and wrist function without increasing the risk of venous thrombosis or impairing bone healing.
Supports BFRT addition to post-op distal radius fracture rehab; extends prior evidence to upper-extremity applications.
Introduction Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common injury in the upper extremities. Blood flow restriction (BFR) has been proven to be effective in improving function in low-load training, which is suitable for post-op rehabilitation. We explored the effectiveness and safety of BFR therapy in DRF patients who underwent surgery.Materials and methods Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned to either the BFR or the regular training (RT; no BFR therapy) groups. All patients completed the same 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program, including anti-inflammatory treatments, strengthening and range of motion (ROM) training. In the BFR group, the pressure was 120 mmHg in strengthening training course. Pain, circumferences of wrists and forearms, ROM, muscle strength, and D-dimer levels were evaluated at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Radius union scoring system (RUSS) was measured at weeks 4 and 12. Finally, wrist functionality (Cooney modification) was evaluated at week 12.Results The BFR group had significantly decreased pain levels compared with the RT group (p < 0.01, effect size= 2.33, −2.44 at weeks 2 and 4). Swelling was effectively relieved in both groups. The wrist swelling was less in the BFR group (p < 0.01, effect size = −2.17 at week 4). The isometric strength of wrist extension (p < 0.01, effect size = 1.5, 3.02 at weeks 2 and 4), flexion (p < 0.01, effect size = 1.33, 2.53 at weeks 2 and 4), and functionality significantly increased in the BFR group (p < 0.01, effect size = 2.80 at week 12). No risk of VT in the BFR group was found. BFR did not threaten bone healing.Conclusions In patients with DRF who underwent corrective surgery, BFR therapy effectively relieved pain and swelling, increased muscle strength and wrist function, and had no additional risks for bone healing and VT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Distal radius fracture (n=35). Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy vs. Regular training (no BFR therapy) was evaluated on Pain levels at weeks 2 and 4 (effect size -2.44, p=< 0.01). In post-operative distal radius fracture patients, blood flow restriction therapy significantly decreased pain (P<0.01) and increased wrist functionality versus regular training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: