Key result
Recurrent neural networks using bioimpedance history outperform feedforward networks in classifying pig intestinal viability.
Why the study?
Does LSTM-RNN using bioimpedance data history improve the accuracy of classifying intestinal viability compared to FNN in a pig model of ischemia?
Does LSTM-RNN using bioimpedance data history improve the accuracy of classifying intestinal viability compared to FNN in a pig model of ischemia?
Machine learning applied to intraoperative bioimpedance measurements can accurately assess intestinal viability in a preclinical model of acute mesenteric ischemia.
May inform ML-based viability tools in mesenteric ischemia; leaves open human translation from porcine models.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of intestinal viability is essential in surgical decision-making in patients with acute intestinal ischemia. There has been no substantial change in the mortality rate (30%-93%) of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) since the 1980s. As the accuracy from the first laparotomy alone is 50%, the gold standard is a second-look laparotomy, increasing the accuracy to 87%-89%. This study investigates the use of machine learning to classify intestinal viability and histological grading in pig jejunum, based on multivariate time-series of bioimpedance sensor data. APPROACH: We have previously used a bioimpedance sensor system to acquire electrical parameters from perfused, ischemic and reperfused pig jejunum (7 + 15 pigs) over 1-16 h of ischemia and 1-8 h of reperfusion following selected durations of ischemia. In this study we compare the accuracy of using end-point bioimpedance measurements with a feedforward neural network (FNN), versus the accuracy when using a recurrent neural network with long short-term memory units (LSTM-RNN) with bioimpedance data history over different periods of time. MAIN RESULTS: Accuracies in the range of what has been reported clinically can be achieved using FNN's on a single bioimpedance measurement, and higher accuracies can be achieved when employing LSTM-RNN on a sequence of data history. SIGNIFICANCE: Intraoperative bioimpedance measurements on intestine of suspect viability combined with machine learning can increase the accuracy of intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability. Increased accuracy in intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability has the potential to reduce the high mortality and morbidity rate of the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strand-Amundsen et al. (2018) studied Acute intestinal ischemia (n=22). LSTM-RNN with bioimpedance data history vs. FNN with single end-point bioimpedance measurement was evaluated on Accuracy of classifying intestinal viability and histological grading. Recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory units using bioimpedance data history achieved higher accuracy in classifying intestinal viability in pig jejunum compared to feedforward networks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: