Key result
Modified nMARQ energy settings linked to ~87% less severe oesophageal injury vs initial protocol.
Why the study?
Does modifying energy settings reduce the incidence of thermal oesophageal injury during pulmonary vein isolation using the nMARQ multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter?
Cohort (n=21)
Does modifying energy settings reduce the incidence of thermal oesophageal injury during pulmonary vein isolation using the nMARQ multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.7% vs 50%
Modifying energy settings by limiting power and application time at the posterior left atrium significantly reduces the high incidence of thermal oesophageal injury associated with the nMARQ catheter.
Modified settings were associated with fewer oesophageal injuries; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: The multipolar irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter (nMARQ™) is a novel tool for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We investigated the incidence of thermal oesophageal injury (EI) using the nMARQ™ for PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the initial six patients (Group 1), RF was delivered at the posterior wall with a maximum duration of 60 s and a maximum power (maxP) of 20 W for unipolar ablation, and a maxP of 10 W for the bipolar ablation. In the latter 15 patients (Group 2), RF application was limited at the posterior wall to a maximum duration of 30 s and a maxP of 15 W for unipolar ablation a max P of 10 W for bipolar ablation. Oesophageal temperature monitoring was performed in all patients and ablation was terminated at a temperature rise >41°C. Endoscopy was carried out within 2 days post-ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed during sinus rhythm and was successfully achieved in 83 of 84 PVs except the septal inferior vein in one patient. Charring was seen in 3 of 21 (14.3%) patients without any evidence of embolism. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in one patient. Endoscopy revealed severe EI in 3 of 6 (50%) patients in Group 1 and in 1 of 15 patients (6.7%) in Group 2. Procedure times between Groups 1 and 2 were similar (228.3 ± 60.2 min vs. 221.3 ± 51.8 min; P = 0.79). CONCLUSION: An unexpectedly high incidence of thermal EI was noted following PVI using the nMARQ™ with the initial ablation protocol. However, the incidence of thermal EI can be sigificantly reduced with limited power and RF application time at the posterior left atrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rillig et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary vein isolation (n=21). Modified energy settings (max 30s duration, 15W unipolar/10W bipolar) vs. Initial energy settings (max 60s duration, 20W unipolar/10W bipolar) was evaluated on Severe thermal oesophageal injury (EI). Modified energy settings during pulmonary vein isolation using the nMARQ catheter reduced the incidence of severe thermal oesophageal injury to 6.7%, compared to 50% with the initial protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: