Key result
Finnish health care links to better maternal well-being vs Japan, driven by ~85% receiving nurse guidance.
Why the study?
Does the Finnish preventive health care system improve maternal subjective well-being compared to the Japanese system in mothers with infants?
Cross-Sectional (n=606)
Yes
Does the Finnish preventive health care system improve maternal subjective well-being compared to the Japanese system in mothers with infants?
The Finnish health care system, featuring continuous individual nursing support, is associated with better maternal subjective well-being compared to the Japanese group-based system.
Does not support immediate practice changes; leaves open whether nurse-delivered information drives maternal well-being differences.
Background: Maternal well-being is an important issue not only for mothers but also for their offspring and whole families. This study aims to clarify differences in subjective well-being for mothers with infants and associated factors by comparing Japanese and Finnish mothers. Methods: In Finland, 101 mothers with infants who received health check-ups at child's age 4 months participated in the study. In Japan, 505 mothers with infants who should receive health check-ups at child's age 4 months and, whose age, age of the infant and number of children matched with the Finnish mothers were selected. The factors associated with maternal subjective well-being were explored by the linear regression analysis. All Finnish mothers had individual infant health check-ups by nurses in Child Health Clinics nearly monthly. The same nurse was responsible for following up the family throughout the years. All Japanese participants received group health check-up once at child's age 3 to 4 months, and a nurse did not cover same child and their mother. Results: Finnish mothers showed significantly better subjective well-being compared with Japanese mothers. Whereas 85% of Finnish mothers responded that they had obtained childcare information from public health nurses, significantly fewer Japanese mothers indicated the same response (8%). Linear regression analyses disclosed that mothers' subjective well-being was associated with country, mothers' stress and age. Conclusion: Finnish mothers had better subjective well-being than Japanese mothers. Our results may indicate that the Finnish health care system supports mothers better than the Japanese health care system does.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yokoyama et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Maternal subjective well-being (n=606). Finnish health care system (individual monthly check-ups) vs. Japanese health care system (single group check-up) was evaluated on Maternal subjective well-being. The Finnish health care system was associated with significantly better maternal subjective well-being compared to the Japanese system, with 85% vs 8% of mothers obtaining childcare info from nurses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: