Key result
4D echocardiography yields ~3 mm larger RV basal diameter measurements compared to 2D echocardiography.
Why the study?
Does 4D echocardiography improve the assessment of tricuspid annulus dimensions and correlation with regurgitation severity compared to 2D echocardiography in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=11)
Blinded to clinical data
No
Does 4D echocardiography improve the assessment of tricuspid annulus dimensions and correlation with regurgitation severity compared to 2D echocardiography in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 47% vs 44%
p-value: p=0.005
4D echocardiography provides significantly different tricuspid annulus measurements compared to standard 2D echocardiography and correlates better with tricuspid regurgitation severity, suggesting it may be a more accurate tool for surgical planning.
Background: The tricuspid valve (TV) is a complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomical structure; however, current guidelines recommend tricuspid annulus (TA) measurements to be performed with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The aim of this study was to compare TV measurements obtained with 2D and four-dimensional (4D) echocardiography for surgical planning. Methods: All echocardiographic data of patients referred to our center for TV assessment were collected. Multimodality imaging data were reviewed, including 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) integrated with information from 3D TTE. Measurements were also compared with those obtained using the 4D Auto Tricuspid Valve Quantification (TVQ) tool. Results: Overall, 11 patients (median age 72 [66–78] years, 18% female) were included in the study. Mild, moderate and severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was present in 6, 3 and 2 patients, respectively. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure was 35 ± 8 mmHg, inferior vena cava diameter 21 ± 4 mm, right atrial area 25 ± 9 cm2 , 4D ejection fraction 45 ± 7%, 4D fractional area change 40 ± 6%, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion 21 [15–25] mm. 2D/4D right ventricular-basal diameter (RVD1) was significantly different (p < 0.005). Similarly, 2D/4D right ventricular diameter measured at the level of the left ventricular papillary muscles (RVD2) was significantly different (p < 0.012), as well as 2D/4D tricuspid annular diameter (p = 0.020). Despite these differences, a strong correlation between variables was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient >0.824). In evaluating the correlation between TR severity and analyzed variables, RVD1 was related to TR severity both at 2D and 4D echocardiography. Conversely, RVD2 and TA diameter were significantly associated with TR severity only at 4D echocardiography. Conclusions: Our results suggest that specific patient subsets could benefit more from TA measurements using the 4D Auto TVQ tool to help identify the mechanisms responsible for TR, including candidates for left-sided valve surgery and patients in whom the indication for TV repair is unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santarpino et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Tricuspid valve assessment (n=11). 4D echocardiography vs. 2D echocardiography was evaluated on Right ventricular-basal diameter (RVD1) (p=0.005). 4D echocardiography yielded significantly different measurements for right ventricular-basal diameter compared to 2D echocardiography (median 47 mm vs 44 mm, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: