Key result
Fixed-dose antihypertensives linked to ~24% fewer office visits and better physical HRQoL vs multi-pill therapy.
Why the study?
Does fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy reduce healthcare utilization and improve health-related quality of life in adults with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension compared to multi-pill combination therapy?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,131)
Does fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy reduce healthcare utilization and improve health-related quality of life in adults with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension compared to multi-pill combination therapy?
Relative Risk: 0.76 (95% CI 0.683–0.846)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.95% vs 17.67%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In adults with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy is associated with significantly lower healthcare utilization and better physical health-related quality of life compared to multi-pill regimens.
FDC was associated with lower acute care utilization; leaves open effects on HRQoL and causal benefits in aTRH.
Background Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive therapy is recommended by hypertension guidelines to improve adherence and blood pressure control. However, its association with healthcare utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) remains unexplored. This study evaluated the association of FDC versus multi-pill combination (MPC) antihypertensive therapy with healthcare utilization and HRQoL among United States (US) adults with medication-defined aTRH . Methods We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2013–2022). Medication-defined aTRH was defined as adults aged ≥18 years with a hypertension diagnosis who were prescribed ≥4 antihypertensive medications from different classes. Medication-defined aTRH patients were then categorized as FDC users if they were prescribed at least one FDC antihypertensive product and as MPC users if they were prescribed antihypertensive classes as separate pills. Healthcare utilization outcomes included office-based visits, outpatient department visits, prescription fill, emergency department visits, home health visits, and inpatient night. HRQoL outcomes included Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to balance covariates. IPTW negative binomial and linear regression models were used to assess the associations between FDC antihypertensive therapy versus MPC antihypertensive therapy and healthcare utilization and HRQoL, respectively. Results The study included 3,131 adults with medication-defined aTRH, of whom 1,518 were FDC users and 1,613 were MPC users. In IPTW models, FDC use was associated with lower rates of office-based visits (rate ratio [RR] = 0.760; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.683–0.846), prescription fills (RR = 0.854; 95% CI: 0.791–0.921), emergency department visits (RR = 0.667; 95% CI: 0.551–0.807), and inpatient nights (RR = 0.596; 95% CI: 0.403–0.879). FDC use was also associated with a higher PCS score; IPTW model (β = 2.686; 95% CI: 1.589–3.783). No significant association was observed with MCS score. Conclusion Among US adults with medication-defined aTRH, FDC antihypertensive therapy was associated with lower healthcare utilization and better physical HRQoL compared with MPC therapy. These findings suggest that an FDC-containing regimen may represent a valuable treatment-simplification strategy in patients requiring multiple antihypertensive classes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eissa A. Jafari (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Medication-defined apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) (n=3,131). Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive therapy vs. Multi-pill combination (MPC) antihypertensive therapy was evaluated on Rate of office-based visits (RR 0.760, 95% CI 0.683-0.846, p=<0.0001). Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy was associated with a lower rate of office-based visits (RR 0.760) and better physical health-related quality of life compared with multi-pill combination therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: