Key result
Patients and providers link high-quality PH care to expansive teams, care coordination, and expert centers.
Why the study?
Gaps in pulmonary hypertension care quality persist despite advancements, and the drivers of these gaps are incompletely understood.
High-quality pulmonary hypertension care requires a comprehensive, well-coordinated multidisciplinary team centered around expert PH centers, highlighting the need for expanded roles like social workers and improved care coordination.
Patient-provider perspectives identify PH care gaps; leaves open scalable quality metrics for validation.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements, gaps in PH care quality persist, though the drivers of these gaps are incompletely understood. Thus, we sought to explore patient and provider perspectives on high-quality PH care. We conducted a multi-site qualitative study at three expert PH centers in the United States, involving telephone interviews with 20 providers and 22 patients. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis, using the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six domains of healthcare quality (safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable) as an a priori coding scheme, with subcodes developed under each domain. We then compared codes across IOM domains and patient and provider data to identify overarching themes. Our analysis revealed three cross-cutting themes that encompassed all six IOM healthcare quality domains, covered all identified subcodes, and represented both provider and patient perspectives: (1) "It takes a village," that is, the expansive team needed to provide care for a patient with PH; (2) The need for care coordination within a PH center, with specialty pharmacies, and with community providers; and (3) PH centers as a model to deliver high-quality care. Finally, participants offered clear recommendations for addressing gaps in care quality, including expanding village members, such as the addition of social workers, improving care coordination by improving patient follow-up and tracking, and expanding access to PH centers by having a PH center presence in the community. These findings highlight key areas for targeted improvements in PH care quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2026) studied Pulmonary hypertension (n=42). Pulmonary hypertension care was evaluated on Perspectives on high-quality PH care. Patients and providers identified three cross-cutting themes for high-quality pulmonary hypertension care: the necessity of an expansive care team, extensive care coordination, and the use of expert PH centers as a model for care delivery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: