Key result
Invasive breast cancer treatments are linked to delayed return to work and prolonged sick leave.
Why the study?
Does the type of oncological treatment impact return to work, work ability, and sickness absence in breast cancer survivors?
Systematic Review (n=26,197)
Does the type of oncological treatment impact return to work, work ability, and sickness absence in breast cancer survivors?
Invasive breast cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radical surgery significantly delay return to work and reduce work ability, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary interventions to support occupational reintegration.
Supports integrating work outcomes into breast cancer treatment decisions; extends evidence for targeted occupational rehabilitation trials.
PURPOSE: Returning to work and maintaining an adequate ability to work serve as key indicators of quality of life, psychological well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the impact of breast cancer treatments on return to work (RTW), work ability (WA), and sick leave (SL) among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The sample consisted of 26 studies published between 2016 and 2025, including prospective multicenter cohorts and national registries from fifteen countries across four continents, with more than 25,000 participants. A methodological quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were performed to synthesize the results. RESULTS: Chemotherapy is the most consistent predictor of prolonged SL, delayed RTW, and significantly reduced WA. Radical surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are associated with a significantly delayed RTW due to physical sequelae. While outcomes showed strong relationship with clinical factors, certain psychosocial variables such as depression, anxiety, and low self-efficacy seemed to act as important secondary factors that can further complicate the process. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that more invasive or aggressive treatments (chemotherapy, ALND, and radical surgery) were associated with poorer outcomes on RTW, WA, and SL. Furthermore, the clinical recovery associated with treatment completion did not necessarily equate to a functional recovery in WA that facilitated a successful RTW. Thus, it is necessary to explore in depth the impact of cancer treatments on WA, alongside psychosocial variables, to design multidisciplinary interventions that enable sustainable occupational reintegration. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2026 (CRD420261322638).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riesco et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Breast cancer (n=26,197). Invasive oncological treatments (chemotherapy, radical surgery, axillary lymph node dissection) vs. Less invasive treatments or no specific treatment was evaluated on Return to work (RTW), work ability (WA), and sick leave (SL). More invasive breast cancer treatments, particularly chemotherapy, axillary lymph node dissection, and radical surgery, were consistently associated with delayed return to work, reduced work ability, and prolonged sick leave.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: