Key result
Adding junction-dissipation to the Poiseuille-Murray model shifts optimal vascular radius away from classical cubic scaling.
Why the study?
Murray's law predicts vessel radius and flow rate relations by balancing Poiseuille dissipation and material cost, but does not account for local junction dissipation at vascular bifurcations.
Comparison
Local junction dissipation versus distributed viscous dissipation effects on vascular bifurcation radius allocation
Design
Theoretical extension of local variational framework with analytical approximations and numerical minimization
Challenges classical cubic scaling for vascular optimization; extends Poiseuille-Murray models but leaves in vivo applicability open.
Murray's law predicts a cubic relation between vessel radius and flow rate by balancing distributed Poiseuille dissipation against material cost. We extend this local variational framework for a single vascular bifurcation by adding a positive-definite junction-dissipation term associated with velocity mismatch and irreversible mixing. For prescribed parent flow and daughter-flow partition, minimization determines the stationary daughter-to-parent radius ratios. In the equal-length Poiseuille baseline, the reduced problem is governed by one dimensionless parameter η, measuring the relative strength of localized junction dissipation and distributed viscous dissipation. As η→0, the classical cubic Murray allocation is recovered; when junction dissipation dominates, the optimum approaches velocity matching, for which the total daughter area equals the parent area. Intermediate values produce a continuous crossover between these limits. Symmetric bifurcations are described by a single η-dependent effective exponent, whereas asymmetric bifurcations generally require distinct branchwise exponents depending on both η and the imposed flow partition. Analytical approximations and direct numerical minimization characterize this local correction to Murray's law. Retaining the complete pairwise closure, including daughter–daughter velocity mismatch, preserves the limiting solutions while shifting the finite-crossover asymmetric radius allocation. The resulting framework provides a local steady-flow variational extension of the Poiseuille–Murray model, in which junction dissipation shifts the optimal radius allocation continuously away from cubic scaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huruntz et al. (2026) studied this question. Incorporating a junction-dissipation term into the Poiseuille-Murray model shifts the optimal vascular radius allocation continuously away from classical cubic scaling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: