Key result
Strategic radiotherapy replanning cuts LAD V15 Gy by ~84% in left-sided lung cancer.
Why the study?
Patients receiving radiotherapy for left-lung tumors risk adverse cardiac events, and emerging research highlights that cardiac substructure doses better predict cardiotoxicity than whole mean heart dose.
Does strategic treatment replanning reduce cardiac substructure radiation doses in patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided lung cancer?
Observational (n=50)
No
Does strategic treatment replanning reduce cardiac substructure radiation doses in patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided lung cancer?
Strategic replanning of left-sided lung cancer radiotherapy can significantly reduce radiation doses to vulnerable cardiac substructures, potentially mitigating future cardiotoxicity.
Strategic replanning may reduce LAD doses in left-sided lung radiotherapy; leaves open whether substructure sparing improves cardiotoxicity outcomes.
BACKGROUND: As curative-intent radiation therapy provides excellent local control for lung tumors, patients are surviving longer to experience treatment-associated adverse cardiac events. Patients treated for left-lung tumors are particularly vulnerable due to the heart's anatomical proximity. While the whole heart is conventionally contoured as an organ-at-risk, emerging research highlights cardiac substructure doses better predict cardiotoxicity post-radiotherapy than mean heart dose. METHODS: An institutional dataset of 50 contrast-enhanced CT scans was compiled from patients treated between 2015 and 2025 for left-sided locally advanced primary lung cancers with definitive photon radiotherapy to 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Twenty-one cardiac substructures were manually contoured on each CT per gold-standard atlases and novel protocols. Mean and maximum substructure doses were extracted from treatment dose-volume histograms, and associations between substructure dose, target volume, tumor location, and demographics were analyzed. Strategic treatment replanning of the 15 cases exceeding a mean whole heart dose of 9 Gy evaluated feasibility of substructure dose reduction. RESULTS: Mean substructure radiation doses were compared against the optimal institutional whole-heart mean dose constraint of 10 Gy. The four highest average mean dose results with 95% confidence intervals were: Aortic Arch 38.6 [32.7-43.8] Gy, Pulmonary Artery 33.3 [29.4-36.8] Gy, Pulmonary Veins 28.8 [24.9-32.4] Gy, and Left Circumflex Coronary Artery 27.3 [21.8-32.7] Gy. In the full cohort, average LAD V15 Gy was 52.7%; in the elevated heart dose cohort, it reached 83.8%. Following replanning, LAD V15 Gy was reduced to 13.7%. CONCLUSION: This is one of few quantifications of substructure dosimetry in left-sided lung radiotherapy. Eleven substructures received mean doses exceeding the institutional whole-heart threshold, underscoring the need to consider substructures treatment planning. Strategic replanning demonstrates clinical feasibility in reducing substructure doses, particularly the left-sided coronary arteries. The resulting contour and dose datasets provide a foundation for predictive modeling and substructure-sparing treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wildman et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left-sided locally advanced primary lung cancer (n=50). Definitive photon radiotherapy was evaluated on Mean and maximum cardiac substructure doses. Definitive photon radiotherapy for left-sided lung cancer delivered high mean doses to cardiac substructures, including 38.6 Gy to the aortic arch, while strategic replanning reduced LAD V15 Gy from 83.8% to 13.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: