Survey finds substantial underestimation of annual motoring costs among motorists, indicating that poor cost visibility reinforces car dependency and hinders sustainable modal shift.
Car ownership and use appears less responsive to cost increases and income declines than might be expected, a pattern often attributed to habit formation and lifestyle adjustment. An additional explanation is that motorists may underestimate how much they spend on owning and running a car, but there is little empirical evidence testing this possibility. Using a representative sample of 801 motorists, we compare intuitive estimates of the annual motoring costs with detailed itemised expenditure across all major fixed (e.g., tax, insurance) and variable (e.g., fuel/charging, parking) costs over the same period. Total reported costs are almost 50% higher than motorists intuit. Median intuitive costs were €2,000, while median itemised costs were €2,923, excluding purchase price and depreciation. Most motorists (over 70%) exhibit this underestimation bias, with similar rates across engine types and socio-demographic groups. These findings are consistent with recall failures and salience bias when motorists consider the costs of owning and running a car, with potential implications for the persistence of car ownership. Improving the visibility and aggregation of motoring costs may complement fiscal and infrastructural measures aimed at supporting sustainable modal shift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: