Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Controlled reader study demonstrates deep learning improves diagnostic accuracy in oral pathologists, suggesting valuable clinical support for early cancer detection.
INTRODUCTION: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral leukoplakia (OLK) impose a growing diagnostic burden on oral pathology services, particularly in primary care. The present study developed a three-class deep learning model to discriminate Normal, OLK and OSCC on mixed-magnification H&E histopathology patches and evaluated its adjunctive value in a controlled human-AI reader study. METHODS: Three publicly available oral histopathology datasets were harmonised, yielding 25,576 patches partitioned at 8:1:1 into training, validation and test sets, with 300 balanced patches reserved for reader assessment. VGG16-BR was built on a VGG16-BN backbone with squeeze-and-excitation and global average pooling, and was compared with ResNet50 and ViT-Base. Six oral pathologists (3 junior, 3 senior) completed the reader task without and then with AI assistance, separated by a 2-week washout. RESULTS: VGG16-BR achieved test-set accuracy 0.9065, macro-F1 0.9086 and macro-AUC 0.9628, with the lowest OSCC-to-Normal misclassification rate (5.1%). AI assistance increased mean accuracy from 0.767 to 0.857 in junior readers and from 0.850 to 0.894 in senior readers, raised Fleiss' κ and shortened reading time. The mixed model showed a significant main effect of AI assistance (P < .001), with no significant interaction between AI assistance and reader experience (P = .265). CONCLUSION: A lightweight three-class deep learning framework improved diagnostic accuracy, inter-reader agreement and efficiency in oral histopathology reading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Positioned as an adjunct rather than a replacement for pathologists, the model provides three-class diagnostic support that may strengthen the early recognition of OLK and OSCC in resource-limited primary care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: