Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical study reveals exact open packing numbers for hypercubes, linking graph packings directly to error-correcting codes.
Motivated by questions of BreΕ‘ar, Samadi and Yero (Discrete Math. 346 (2023), 113348) on injective coloring, we identify the open packing number of the n -dimensional hypercube π π exactly with standard coding-theoretic quantities by showing that π π β‘ ( π π ) = 2 β’ π΄ 2 β‘ ( π β 1 , 3 ) = 2 β’ π΄ 2 β‘ ( π , 4 ) , where π΄ 2 β‘ ( π , π ) is the maximum size of a binary code of length n and minimum distance at least d . This translates known results from coding theory into values of π π β‘ ( π π ) . In particular, this gives π π β‘ ( π 9 ) = 4 0 , improving the previously known bounds. We further prove that π π is perfect injectively colorable if and only if π΄ 2 β‘ ( π β 1 , 3 ) is a power of two, equivalently if and only if π΄ 2 β‘ ( π β 1 , 3 ) = 2 π β 1 β β l o g 2 β‘ π β . For the edge analogue studied by BreΕ‘ar, Dravec, HedΕΎet and Samadi (Discrete Math. 348 (2025), 114458), we give an explicit syndrome construction inspired by extended Hamming codes. It recovers the sharp value π π π β‘ ( π π ) = 2 π β 1 when n is a power of two, and gives lower bounds that attain a 1 β π β‘ ( 1 ) fraction of the general upper bound 2 π β 1 in all dimensions. In particular, it gives π π π β‘ ( π 9 ) β₯ 2 2 4 , improving the bound π π π β‘ ( π 9 ) β₯ 1 8 0 obtained from the earlier general construction. We also show that the upper bound 2 π β 1 for π π π β‘ ( π π ) is attained precisely in power-of-two dimensions, and sharpen it to 2 π β 1 β 2 when π β₯ 4 is not a power of two.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juho Lauri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: